[I-Sheng]: I noticed a seemingly on-going debate about whether a fast-spinning blackhole could be practically used as a particle accelerator (with SM scattering, DM annihilation observables). Here is a list of papers involved and the latest one among them came out last week.
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0909.0169
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.2243
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.3363
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1212.1235
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1159
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3429
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0909.0169
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.2243
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.3363
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1212.1235
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1159
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3429
- http://www.nature.com/
nature/journal/v493/n7430/ [Jacco]full/nature11717.html - Addendum to: QRPA uncertainties and their correlations in the analysis of neutrinoless double β decay, A. Faessler, G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, V. Rodin, A.M. Rotunno, F. Simkovic, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1587 [Patrick].
I noticed a seemingly on-going debate about whether a fast-spinning blackhole could be practically used as a particle accelerator (with SM scattering, DM annihilation observables). Here is a list of papers involved and the latest one among them came out last week.
ReplyDeletehttp://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0909.0169
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.2243
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0911.3363
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1212.1235
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1159
http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3429
Addendum to: QRPA uncertainties and their correlations in the analysis of neutrinoless double β decay, A. Faessler, G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, V. Rodin, A.M. Rotunno, F. Simkovic, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1587 [Patrick].
ReplyDelete